Melissa+Dedemus

= The new health care bill requires insurance to take on children with pre-existing health conditions immediately upon the bill becoming law according to President Barack Obama. The insurers say wait a minute, we have four more years. Adults dealing with pre-existing conditions will have to wait, if they can survive, for another four years before insurance companies are prohibited from covering them. The insurance companies found a loophole in the health care bill. On Monday Raw Story reported that the companies are agreeing to fix that loophole. The move comes after media reported on the insurance companies trying to worm their way out of covering the youngest Americans out of coverage. "Health plans recognize the significant hardship that a family faces when they are unable to obtain coverage for a child with a pre-existing condition," Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, said in a letter to Sebelius. For the time being the bill will be searched for any other loopholes that could endanger the coverage of children. "Health insurance reform is designed to prevent any child from being denied coverage because he or she has a pre-existing condition," Sebelius wrote to Ignagni. "Now is not the time to search for nonexistent loopholes that preserve a broken system." Once the bill becomes law parents will not have to worry that conditions such as asthma will be a barrier for their children when it comes to seeing the doctor. In the past insurers excluded life saving inhalers and respiratory care when it came to asthmatic children, care that is needed in an emergency. The United States currently is ranked last among 21 developed countries by UNICEF for children's health and safety. In 2008 7.3 million children lacked health insurance according to Health Care Reform Center. Families with sick children often have to rely on state programs, if their income level is low enough to qualify. If their income is above the levels set by states then they have to pay out of pocket for those costs. =

= =

= This article is about who the new US Health Care bill will cover, and when. It is very biased in the favour of the people with pre-existing conditions. It says the insurance companies are "trying to worm their way out" of things and find loopholes, and this may not be true. Yes, of course the insurance companies are trying to make money, but if the Bill doesn't state they have to cover everyone right away, they don't have too. The article makes it seem like they are manipulating the Bill in their favours, but if the Bill's writer didn't state exactly what they meant, it's not the insurer's fault. The Bill should have been written so that there was no 'loopholes'. =

//other article://

 Fairfax, Virginia (CNN), March 2010  -- President Obama made a final, urgent  public plea for health care reform Friday, slamming private insurers and accusing his plan's opponents of spreading lies and distortions. The president's populist push on his signature issue came two days before a planned climactic vote in Congress. The House of Representatives is set to vote Sunday on a sweeping $875 billion reform plan that cleared the Senate in December, as well as another $65 billion of compromise changes to the measure. "In just a few days, a century-long struggle with culminate in a historic vote," Obama declared at a campaign-style event at Virginia's George Mason University. "If you believe that it's right, you've got to help us finish this fight. ... The time for reform is right now." If the Senate bill passes the House, Obama will sign it into law. If the package of changes is passed, it will be taken up by the Senate. Obama warned that if Congress rejects his plan, "the insurance industry will continue to run amok." "The only question left is this: Are we going to let the special interests win again, or are we going to make this vote a victory for the American people?" he asked. The president, who delayed an overseas trip to help make a final reform push, was expected to meet with and call wavering House members after his speech. He is also expected to address the entire House Democratic caucus on Saturday, according to four Democratic officials familiar with Obama's plans. The pitch to lawmakers will be made on Capitol Hill, White House aides said. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, is struggling to round up 216 votes from her 253-member caucus to pass the plan. No Republicans are expected to back it. Twenty-nine House Democrats have indicated that they will join Republicans in opposing the Senate plan. That leaves opponents of reform nine votes shy of defeating the measure. Some Democrats appeared to be resisting pressure from their party's leadership. One undecided member, Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar, said he had refused to answer a telephone call from the White House. Cuellar said he was refusing to do so before deciding how to vote. "At the end of the day, when we take a vote, [Obama's]not going to be out there supporting me and running my elections," Cuellar said. "It's going to be up to me to run my election. And it's up to me to decide on my own that this is in the best interests of my district." Administration officials claim, however, that the reform plan has been picking up momentum in recent days. They said they had a "really good day" Thursday, when the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the compromise plan would cost $940 billion over 10 years while reducing the deficit by $138 billion -- $20 billion more than the bill passed by the Senate. The budget office numbers reassured some fiscally  conservative Democrats, according to congressional leaders. One previously undecided Democrat, Ohio Rep. John Boccieri, said he decided to vote for the plan after being "very encouraged" by the budget office report. "A lot of people are telling me this decision could cost me my job. ... [but] I'm standing for what I believe in," he said. The plan also received key endorsements Thursday from the AFL-CIO and the Federation of American Hospitals. The American Medical Association officially backed the plan Friday. If enacted, the measure would constitute the biggest expansion of federal health care guarantees since the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid over four decades ago. It would extend insurance coverage to an additional 32 million Americans, according to a preliminary analysis from the budget office. Republicans contend that the plan amounts to a government takeover of the private insurance system that will do little to slow spiraling medical costs . They argue that it would lead to higher premiums and taxes for middle-class families while resulting in deep Medicare cuts. Among other things, the plan would expand Medicare prescription drug coverage, increase federal subsidies to help people buy insurance and ban denials of coverage for pre-existing conditions. It seeks to bridge the gap between previous House and Senate bills partly by watering down  and delaying the implementation of a tax on high-end insurance plans. As with earlier House and Senate plans, it includes significant reductions in Medicare spending, in part through changes in payments made under the Medicare Advantage program. It also eliminates a deeply unpopular provision  in the Senate bill that provides a special exemption for the state of Nebraska from paying increased Medicaid expenses. The decisions to reduce the tax on high-end insurance plans and eliminate the Nebraska exemption -- the "Cornhusker Kickback" -- are two of many concessions being made made to House liberals unhappy with the prospect of voting for the less expansive Senate bill. Pelosi has tried to further sweeten the deal <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 19px;"> for some more progressive members of the Democratic caucus by adding a large student loan reform measure to the compromise plan. The measure, which is a priority for Obama, would end the practice of having private banks offer student loans and would expand direct lending from the government. The speaker may also try to help unhappy House Democrats by allowing them to avoid a direct vote on the Senate bill. She is strongly considering pushing for a vote on a rule that would simply "deem" the Senate bill to be passed. The House then would proceed to a separate vote on the changes incorporated in the $940 billion version of the plan. GOP leaders failed Thursday to force a vote on a resolution requiring the Senate health care bill to be brought to an up-or-down vote. Republicans also are <span style="color: #ff0000; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 19px;">fuming <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 19px;">over Democrats' decision to use a legislative maneuver called reconciliation, which will allow the compromise measures -- if passed by the House -- to clear the Senate with a simple majority of 51 votes. Senate Democrats lost their filibuster-proof 60-seat supermajority in January with the election of GOP Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts. Republicans contend that reconciliation, which is limited to provisions pertaining to the budget, was never meant to facilitate passage of a sweeping reform measure such as the health care bill. Democrats point out that reconciliation was used to pass several major bills in recent years, including George W. Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. House Democrats have expressed concern that the compromise measures will not be approved by the more conservative Senate. Pelosi said Friday, however, that "when our members go to vote, they will have all the assurances they need" that the Senate will approve the compromise plan. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, will be at the White House on Saturday when Obama meets with the House Democrats, two Democratic officials said. He will help reassure <span style="color: #ff0000; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 19px;">nervous House members <span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 19px;"> that the Senate intends to finish the job next week, they said.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~


 * Summary: Obama tries to sway more people to vote in favour of American Health care reform. Not many of the opposing party (Republicans) are thought to be voting for it, and 29 of the Democratic party members aren't in favour either. The article makes it seem as though the Democrats are very desperate for votes, which may not be entirely true.

All the words that I highlighted in this are all opinionated of the author of the article. The words could be different if the writer had a different view of the Bill, so the article is biased. When they say the House members are nervous or that Nancy Pelosi from the US House of Representatives is trying to 'sweeten the deal', that is how the writer sees the situation, and not necessarily the opinion of other people.

**